Design for Life

Like most new BBC television programs, Design for Life takes its name from a 90s pop song. The Manics, durrr. Like ‘Life of Riley‘ and, erm, I’m sure there is something else… well unlike most Caroline Quentin vehicles, Design for Life isn’t shit.

As is the norm now for most new BBC television programs, it takes about 7 minutes to get started. Those first 7 minutes of the show are catching up, explaining what happened in the previous episode. In this day of Sky+, HDD recorders and (more importantly) iPlayer, is this necessary? I know it makes the show cheaper to make, but for crying out loud. Just make it a little shorter if you’re going to piss around so much.

It’s shot beautifully well and we get to see plenty of the beautiful bits of Paris, as apposed to the hours and hours of shots of that bloody Gerkin thing in London that anyone who watches the Apprentice has forced upon them. When talking about this show, I’m going to compare it to the Apprentice, because the similarities are obvious (and I’m lazy). It features a team of designers (business men?) who fight to show they are the best designer (most shouty business man?) to prove they can work with designer extraordinaire, Philipee Stark (Suralun?).

the Design for Life participants

the Design for Life participants

Participant Nebil is the most ‘Apprentice like’, because he patronizes everyone he gets to talk to. This probably is an attempt to look better than everyone else but at least he does know his shit. I’m sure that to anyone who actually has their design game-face on, his “let me just explain this too you, thicko” tone will probably make him look like a bit of a dick. Still, he gets a lot of screen time because he has a lot to say and even his dick-ishness is minor compared with the mega-cocks that rut around in any given episode of the Apprentice. He gets his come-upance tho, which is another reason why I love this show. It’s obvious that the shows producers set him off against the other stand-out, Ilsa, because she’s got a pretty good set of claws and will bite back.

I guess a large part of the show will boil down to “do you like Philipee Stark”. I do. Him and his bloody chairs, or whatever the hell he’s supposed to be most famous for. He’s pretentious, but y’know he’s a brilliant designer so he can afford to be and after all, this is design. You’re supposed to be pretentious. He also dismisses the participants easily, based on some seemingly whimsical idea he has. Again: he’s a designer. I’ve had designers happily shit on my ideas in the past and non of them were exactly Phillipee Stark. At least when he drops people he’s really nice about it. I’d love to be sacked by him. None of this catch-phrase “You’re fired” crap. I also like his attitude towards ‘wasteful’ design. He’s green without being sickly. Personally Alan Sugar really gets on my tits because turned Amstrad into crap (I love my old CPC6128) and I tire of his attitude and his stupid Labour ‘business-tzar’ beard.

Further contrasts to the Apprentice are easy to highlight. The participants are young, attractive and probably smell quite good. They are also very, very white. And middle class uni-graduates. They actually get very visibly nervous, which makes you feel a little more sympathetic. Hell, in the 2nd episode one of the participants has a genuinely great idea: Polly and her water-level meter. What have the Apprentice chimps ever done, but chuck crap at each other? Design for Life actually talks about design. Pitching, ideas, briefs, presentations and all the bullshit in-between. That’s some real genuine content from the BBC.

The show is at 9.00pm on BBC 2, Mondays but you can follow the show here, on iPlayer.

As an aside; it’s narrated by Adam ‘Adam + Joe’ Buxton. I look forward to the DVD release where Joe does a funny-man voice-over.


7 Responses to “Design for Life”

  1. Ian Parr (devolute) 's status on Sunday, 04-Oct-09 18:53:17 UTC - Identi.ca Says:

    […] http://www.devolute.net/2009/10/04/design-for-life/ a few seconds ago from Gwibber […]

  2. nick Says:

    >> I’ve had designers happily shit on my ideas in the past and non of them were exactly Phillipee Stark <<

    would doing it in a french accent make it better?

  3. Ian Says:

    It’s not just that. It’s the beard as well. AND THE CHAIRS.

  4. Graphic design blog: Working diary» Graphic Design Blog: Working diary Says:

    […] Follow this link: devolute.net » Blog Archive » Design for Life […]

  5. Tweets that mention devolute.net » Blog Archive » Design for Life -- Topsy.com Says:

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ilsa Parry and U.V. Blue. U.V. Blue said: devolute.net » Blog Archive » Design for Life http://tinyurl.com/y9s7lxe […]

  6. troy Says:

    Anna is such a babe! and how the hell did that lighting glove get into the last 4 theres already something like that invented it’s called mace!!! The tipping pot would have been deadly to see in working order. she should continue with it.

  7. Barry Says:

    Is ‘product design’ a bargain relative of ‘Industrial Design’. I’m confused by the difference and so, it appears, were the contestants.

    Materials knowledge was wafer-thin and the habitual comment, ‘we don’t know what he wants’ was tedious. What do YOU want? ‘Designer should be a verb not a noun!

    There is apparently hardly any opportunity for students of British Design Courses to be acquainted with volume manufacturing environments or working Industrial Designers. Maybe our shrinking industrial economy is to blame but the Universities are also guilty of irresponsibly low staff-student ratios and myopic syllabuses. Three problem areas accrue from this series:-

    1. An over reliance on superficially contrived drawing with little visual analysis and hardly any early stage 3D development;

    2. The wrong software for 3D development and presentation, (why use a limited 2D package, (illustrator), to describe a 3D object when there are excellent simple 3D packages like Rhino or Solidworks, which can be used creatively and will fully describe and analyse form while giving properly dimensioned 2D drawings or CAD files for formal modelmaking.

    2. An over dependance on ‘found’ images and objects rather than relying on creative ability, sculptural sensitivity, technical and anthropometric knowledge and a love of humanity.

    When are British Universities going to deliver the courses our students deserve and have already paid for?

Leave a Reply